Talk:Trichocereinae
Schlumpberger (2012) classification is followed here, dividing the subtribe in many monophyletic genera. This might not be generally followed in the future, in favour of a large Echinopsis sens. lat. including most genera in the subtribe. However, as today, a great deal of the generally accepted species lack combinations under Echinopsis. Uleli (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- However, the segregation of Echinopsis sensu Schlumpberger (2012) is itself highly controversial and should not have been undertaken c.f. Anceschi & Magli (2013) and for a synopsis see Hernández-Ledesma (2015). The most conservative approach, based upon Hunt (2006), Hernández-Ledesma (2015) and generic circumscriptions in COL, should have been retained until consensus has been reached. However, I will not edit out the problem. Andyboorman (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow editors,
I have just modified 1 external links on Trichocereinae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140701024528/http://www.cactusconservation.org/CCI/library/pdf/Albesiano_Terrazas_2012_Haseltonia_17_3-23.pdf to http://www.cactusconservation.org/CCI/library/pdf/Albesiano_Terrazas_2012_Haseltonia_17_3-23.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)